President Yoweri Museveni

I once asked a supposedly serious, more reflective surrogate of President Yoweri Museveni about why the man wanted to stick to power so bad – and was ready to go on forever.

What does he want to achieve? “They say he has been the best at playing the different strong units of the country: Baganda, Catholics, Muslims, control over the military. That this is his genius and that is why he has been able to keep power all this while. Granted.

But to what end? For what? Why does he need to keep power? The surrogate said to me that he didn’t know either. But added, quite sombrely, that if you spoke to the man – which he does quite often – the man believes he has done so much for Uganda. He believes he is the best thing to ever happen to the country.

The surrogate called it some sort of delusion. Because when anyone looks around, there is clearly nothing to show for these forty years. Sleep? Roads? Everything has been run down.

Dear reader, I am among the lucky ones to travel and seen the region – our neighbours. We are in the ranks of Malawi, South Sudan, Somalia and Burundi. Those are our comparisons in the region. On a visit to Dar es Salaam, for example, Uganda looks like Stone Age.

The public transport (Mwendokasi buses), the public medical facilities, their expansive road networks, the general air of happiness you feel among Tanzanians. You don’t even have to go all the way to Dar es Salaam: motorists using the Mutukula border understand this imagery really well.

From Masaka to Mutukula, it feels like you are driving through ekikuute, a rugged cattle road through the forests. Immediately you cross into Tanzania, you get the feel you are driving into a country with a government. Yet indeed for Uganda, this is a major entry point.

But the fellows running Uganda seem not to care. I will not mention Kigali or Nairobi. Neither will I mention Lusaka or Khartoum or Addis Ababa. These are our neighbours but in a world of their own.

Yet, they haven’t had a singular government for all this time. (Rwanda is the closest to us in terms of longevity of a sitting president – and there is plenty to show for their man’s long stay). One would assume that long reign enables a president to see their policies implemented and pushed through.

Especially if they are good at playing and confusing all opposition forces, as is often claimed. Not this one. Not Yoweri Museveni. One of the coldest but very honest comments I have been told by refugees escaping Khartoum is how run- down they found peaceful Uganda.

And how broke Ugandans are. You have nothing, they said. They cannot believe their eyes, yet they, too, lived under an autocrat. My intention here is not to talk about how Museveni has sold the country to foreigners. (All other African countries somehow did; this was forced on them).

But how Museveni never had the mind to build anything native within this period is mindboggling. Sadly, not even for his ethnic base, the Banyankore or Basiita, or Bachwezi as his son has bragged about Runyankore being the language of power and privilege.

Reader, I cannot understand how one could be president for forty years and does not have a single relative or close friend owning a bank, a gold mine, a telecom company or a major coffee exporting company. What is this?

That every time we read the national budget, we are also reading the profits of Museveni’s friends and relatives! This is not smart at all. I would understand if Museveni was unwilling to build anything for the country (because these are random people out there). But even for friends, kindred and close associates!

They own nothing significant except deals from government – tenders and corruption cuts. The problem here is that Museveni’s associates and relatives will fall into penury as soon as the man leaves office – because their only source of income, which is the national budget and corruption from connection, will not be under their control anymore.

No wonder they are forcing Muhoozi onto the country to guarantee continuity – but still for the same peanut cuts in budget and commissions. Museveni loves juxtaposing himself against President Amin.

Yes, it is not just mindboggling that a man who has been in power for forty years endlessly contrasts himself against a man who was in power not just for eight years, but also before 70 per cent of Ugandans were born.

However, this juxtaposition remains embarrassingly telling that Idi Amin, with little formal education, will remain the undisputed father of the nation: As Lwanga Lunyiigo recently, and Mahmood Mamdani (1995) among other elite opinion have noted, the year 1972 is the year that Uganda actually earned her independence.

This came with the expulsion of British corporations (through Indians banking in the UK). Sadly, Museveni presided over the return of these corporations, without even thinking about creating room for natives. What a legacy!

Before Prof Lwanga Lunyiigo published, Uganda: An Indian Colony 1898-1972, Dr Olive Kobusingye had published, The Patient, which is a book about our medical sector, specifically, Mulago hospital.

The image is that the medical sector is itself a patient. It is sick. But more significantly, Kobusingye, carefully, meticulously, walks us through Idi Amin’s health sector up to Yoweri Museveni.

Dear reader, there has not been a man much-maligned than Idi Amin. As far as public health is concerned, this man not only valued medical professionals, but had love for country.

He committed crimes – like all folks with power tend to do – but for country. For him, it wasn’t politics for politics’ sake, it was politics for something.

yusufkajura@gmail.com

Author is a political theorist based at Makerere University.

6 replies on “Museveni’s politics for politics’ sake”

  1. You put it so well! One thing that invites you to Uganda is disorder; 40 years’ worth of disorder is quite suffocating!

  2. But Dr. Dr. Yusuf if asked, it is coming to 40 years in power; what is our 84-years-old “Problem of Africa” and the NRM party still resisting?

    E.g. if in less than 2 years the youngest political party, NUP put up a decent party Headquarter at Kubiri, but for 39 years and counting of absolute power, the NRM has not even build a grass-thatched HUT to show as their Headquarter, what else do Ugandans expect?

    In other words, at the demise of our “Problem of Africa”, even symbolically there will be no trace of the NRM; except the mushroomed “corruption/criminal monuments” (built from the proceeds of corruption/plunder of our sweat and blood tax money) in form of shopping arcades/mall,hotels and/or apartments in unplanned urban centers and suburbs.

  3. Doc, the compulsion between Amin and M7, is that they’re both ruthless dictators. The difference is, Amin loved Uganda with all his heart. He was frank with us. He unambiguously told us that he was a life president and whoever tied to topple his govt would face death by firing squad. Pure and simple. Amin faced all kinds of embargos, however, Uganda had a far better infrastructure of roads, hospitals, factories, schools and our maximum legal tender was Sh. 100. After 40 years in power and without any embargos [but donations in millions of dollars], our current legal tender is Sh. 50,000. Mind you, M7 reduced Sh. 1m to 700. He sliced off 3 zeros to make it 1,000, then 30% off. So, Amin was a dictator but not an organized criminal like M7.

  4. The problem of Uganda are Ugandans who read and hear things but say and write what they wanted to hear and read. Amin came to power, got what the UPC I government has added on to what the British colonialist had put in place.

    Late Idi Amin was brutal but not to the ordinary Ugandans, he was only brutal on people he suspect may join late president Obote in Tanzania or people he suspect my be sending informations to late president Obote in Tanzania. The ordinary poor Ugandans were left to live their life they was it was before Amin came to power. There was no land grabbing, no charcoal trade or timber trade by government officials. The reminant of Uganda army who were in Amin government did not involve themselves in to reckless tree cutting for charcoal trade and timber trade like today.
    The UNLA and UPC government were not given time to grow and become strong in order to lead the country to prosperity, after the 1980 election. Museveni and his thugs went to the bush six weeks after that election which in itself a clear indication that they wanted to disrupt any developmental and other programs that government had in their plan. The UNLA which as stall being supported by the Tanzanian forces found themselves in another war in Luwero and West Nile. If Museveni was facing the war in northern Uganda and another one in Buganda, I am sure he would not be in power today. Baganda gave Museveni this latitude of being in power todate.

    UPC and UNLA could have done much better than the Museveni’s NRA/M government just in the five years Ugandans gave them should there have been no war against it in Buganda. Even the accusation that Kiswahilli language which was being used by Tanzanian forces who helped Ugandans to remove Amin and Ugandan exiles who have live in Tanzania for 9 years was not a language of torture and brutality as some Ugandans still insinuate to date. That language was the only language Tanzanian force could communicate with, with their Ugandans counter part.

    Today, Museveni is staying in power because of the highly education army, highly educated ministers, RDC and police officers, yet these people know the consequences of what they are doing. The past army in Obote I & II and Amin were and are still being refered to as illitrates. Yet they have no record of land grabbing, enviromental destruction, sodimy of political opponents.

  5. Like him or hate him, he has accomplished what no other president of Uganda has managed to do, been declared the president of Uganda for 40 years. The means are debatable but not sophisticated . But don’t you think having grown up the way he did; father ?, home ?, respect? , he is only on one mission to get that which he lacked while he was growing up and enjoy it to its limit ?
    And if the “opposition” were really serious, they would offer him an alternative and he would leave the “presidency” faster than a teenage boy leaves his pregnant girlfriend ?
    Looking at where he came from, by nature not being enterprising( in the serious sense, forget decieving people), would he leave power willing to go back and deliver milk for the byanyima household ? No way.
    Maybe we are complicating simple things, can’t we give the guy an alternative?

  6. No same individual can genuinely support this rogue regime.All they targeting are government deals and favours.Atter woke selfishness.

Comments are closed.