In 1967 and 1968, the company says it leased the plots of land measuring 292 acres to the then National Housing Corporation, now National Housing and Construction and Company Limited. They explain that by 1972, the National Housing and Construction Company had constructed some residential housing units in the land. 

The 292 hectares of land was reportedly duly registered leaving out 172 acres. They claim that in 1972 both the leased and unleased land was reportedly expropriated by President Idi Amin and turned into an army barracks known as Kireka barracks. However, the company repossessed the land legally from the National Resistance Army/Uganda People’s Defence Forces in 1998, which used the vacant space as a cattle farm for commanders.    

The company, however, claims when the army relocated to Bombo barracks in 1999, Uganda Police Force occupied the land immediately and has stayed there to date. The applicants claim that the army didn’t hand over the land despite knowing its lawful owners. They also contend that during the insurgency in northern Uganda, various army officers resettled many people from northern and eastern Uganda on the contested land.

They also claim that the Works ministry without consent of Kireka Estates Company occupied various plots on the contested land and erected a laboratory, which has remained there to date. The applicants also claim that Local Councils officials, who, are agents of government have been conniving with unknown people to give away plots on the suit land, adding that now the company has lost capacity to evict them.  

They argue that the settlers are violent people, who, at one time burnt the vehicle of former Kira town council LC III chairperson, mayor Mamerito Mugerwa and attempted to kill him. They say that their efforts to recover the land have been futile despite the fact that the occupants are fully aware of its ownership. 

Now, the applicants want court to order that the land be valued by the chief government valuer and also issue orders stopping further trespass. They also want court to order that government compensates them after the valuation report as well as general damages for inconveniences arising from the trespass and violation of their Constitutional right to property among other orders.  

Court is yet to summon the attorney general to file his defense to the suit. Â