Little thought has been given to the centrality and impact of sound doctrine in modelling the spiritual life plus character of Anglicans in Uganda—to the extent that today, the COU is fast losing its identity and can easily be mistaken to be part of the so-called ‘Pentecostal’ movement—except that one is just yet to witness electrocution of believers and ‘soccer matches’ inter alia in ‘our’ sanctuaries.
Far more awful to note, is the manner in which many of our ministers—whether in purple or grey or black—have yielded to the wicked lure of searching for the lost coin rather than the lost sheep; not to mention those caught ‘feasting’ on their own ‘sheep’.
To put it crudely, the COU is infested with unscrupulous persons taking advantage of the gaps within the structures to steal church properties, chiefly money and land. To our dismay, they have been rewarded with titles or higher positions.
One, for instance, may wish to inquire into the spirit behind the creation of the Church Commissioners Holding Company Ltd (CCHCL) as a parallel body to the Registered Trustees of the COU! Or the wily extension of the boundaries of Kampala diocese into Namirembe and Mukono dioceses, divergent to the recommendations of the Bikangaga Report on the ‘Survey on Administration and Finance of the Church in Uganda’ hence the COU Provincial Constitution of 1972 (as amended in 1994 and 2016).
These, as history reveals, have grave legal, political and socio-economic ramifications not only for the COU but for the entire country, as well.
This rather unhappy train of events entreats one to seriously reconsider the prospect of sturdy regional provinces under a federal arrangement as just but one way of stemming it. This has a basis in covenant theology and is, therefore, biblical.
Also, for a very long time, the COU has been deluded by some quarters to believe that her stand against the instruction of unbiblical stuff means thus: a split-up with fellow Anglicans who have a contrary view. The COU ought to be far too aware of the victims within her own ranks, who, every Sunday have to feed on ‘biblical/theological (un)truths’ by the very preachers she herself has afforded the pulpit.
The Anglican Communion, as Michael Ramsey (the 100th Cantuar) defined it: “is a family of Anglican churches…of a good [vast array] of races… [with] a common expression of the Christian faith—the Bible, the sacraments, the episcopal ministry and a good deal of tradition that holds us together; and we’re all in communion with the See of Canterbury, and the Cathedral in Canterbury is just a kind of a symbol of our common unity.”
The split-up, then, is un-Anglican and sadly, we now lack basis to stay with that tag. Finally, the archbishop’s office has both a constitutional and canonical mandate. Just in case the prospective occupant feels pangs about discharging the same, there is no point for us to ascend to St Paul’s cathedral on Namirembe hill to witness his installation come Sunday March 1, 2020.
The writer is a lawyer and concerned Christian.