Log in
Updated few hours ago

PDM is another liberation scam with tuneful antipoverty slogan

Nebbi locals queue up for PDM

Nebbi locals queue up for PDM

The Parish Development Model’s (PDM) current design has left many questions unanswered, especially on its ability to stamp out poverty.

Whereas in its current form some quick political dividends may be realised, socio-economic transformation of the poor will be hard to reach with PDM as history has shown with similar programmes and slogans.

Like the earlier programmes of Entandikwa, Prosperity for All, YLP, WEP, NAADs, OWC under the army, Emyooga, etc that failed to deliver on NRM’s socio-economic transformation and liberation agenda, PDM is deceitfully yet tunefully being sold as a sure, special purpose vehicle that will lift many Ugandans out of poverty.

From the onset, the architects made PDM look like a bus to the promised land until MPs were sent home on a PDM monitoring exercise. The oversight visit has helped shade light on the reality of PDM.

To the surprise of many, prior to the MPs being sent on a PDM monitoring exercise, an MP from Western Uganda subscribing to the National Resistance Movement party remarked in one of our parliamentary deliberations that the PDM is a ‘scam.’ Rt. Hon. Speaker’s PDM monitoring directive has now helped to triangulate the MP’s assertion and expose the magnitude of the scam in PDM as a vehicle for wealth creation.

Now in the third quarter of the financial year, some PDM groups are yet to receive PDM Parish Sacco revolving funds under pillar three. By now parish Saccos should have received Shs 75 million on their account but that is not the case. Elsewhere, abuse of some of the PDM resources has been reported.

Indeed, if the target of PDM was an affirmative action for putting money in the pockets of poor households living outside the financial economy, why are PDM resources not prioritising and following the predominantly poor in Karamoja, Acholi, West Nile etc where poverty levels are the highest?

The PDM architects’ refusal to rely on poverty data has led to PDM resources being spread thin. Like past failed poverty eradication programmes, PDM could end up enriching a wrong group due to poor design and corruption, among other factors. PDM was designed and modelled without engagement and input from targeted beneficiaries - the poor people.

Instead, non beneficiaries were consulted, leading to a design based on speculation. The PDM has also never been piloted. Without lessons learnt from earlier experiences, there is little hope that such a rapidly scaled-up programme will succeed. Further to note is that the implementation of PDM’s pillar three commenced without clear guidelines.

The ever-changing PDM guidelines is a sign of a poorly-conceived idea. As a result, confusing messages are being sent to beneficiaries. Coupled with cumbersome paperwork and delayed release of funds, the little initial interest in the model has been shuttered by the small resource envelope of PDM, which is a drop in the ocean.

Despite PDM having seven pillars, there is silence on the funding modality for other pillars. Where will Parish Development Committees get money for things such as infrastructure development, human capital development, etc as envisioned under PDM?

The new guideline under pillar three, which requires individuals to borrow from parish Saccos instead of groups that are more familiar with the behaviour of their members, makes appraisal and recovery of the loans difficult. The requirement for poor households to provide collateral to guarantee their loans is a hurdle designed to limit their participation.

The PDM loan has come with cumbersome paperwork for the target group, making it costly for participants. It is not clear how these costs associated with new changes, cumbersome paperwork and movement expenses will be covered. For instance, the removal of parish chiefs as signatories to parish Sacco accounts led to more paperwork and costs in changing signatories.

Even now, before borrowing, individual beneficiaries are being asked to open new accounts in banks before they can access the money. Some are already facing hurdles in the processing accounts, ranging from lack of national identity cards, illiteracy, distant banking services, costly account opening, old age, disability, etc. Experience has shown that too much signing discourages poor people. There is fear they could abandon PDM altogether.

Not only that, the increment of the PDM loan interests from the earlier communicated 3 per cent to 6 per cent without involving them is the latest shock to beneficiaries. Already, mistrust has been created in PDM as a vehicle for wealth creation and the people who deliver news of the changes.

Coupled with unnecessary delays in the implementation of PDM, lack of alignment with specific conditions of beneficiaries such as weather and untimely release of funds (off season), farmer’s planning will be impacted and their value for PDM diminished.

This compounded by the reduction of the initial loan tenure from one year to 3-6 months, a change that will impact some enterprises like cassava value chain that cannot financially close within six months. Making repayments of PDM loans within reduced new timelines will only serve to bruise beneficiaries, and not lift them up.

Unlike other Saccos, lack of clarity on how individuals or groups will share dividends realised by the parish Saccos is what will continue to make PDM appear like a scam. For as long as the above concerns on PDM are not redressed, Ugandans can as well prepare for the next failed programme.

The writer is a messenger and spokesman of the people of Maracha Constituency.

Comments

+4 #1 Lysol 2023-03-16 01:45
Young man, it seems you are clueless and too rudimentary about the article you have posted. While at it take a better selfie of yourself.
Report to administrator
+7 #2 PaulM 2023-03-16 08:39
Yeah, we all know it is a scam like the others before it. Poverty is here to stay so long as Mu7 is in power.
Report to administrator
+2 #3 Akot 2023-03-16 18:51
Lysol,

Ugandans are not aware it's them who are ensuring their poverty by keeping migrant Museveni in post! Museveni got what he dreamed, faught for & will leave Uganda as his family heritage!

But all Ugandans do is just help the family tighten hold on the zone fromed by their tribal lands & riches, while NOTHING is done to ensure UNITY to end the family business!

Tribally divided powerless Ugandans are prepared to accept Museveni's son when the dad dies finally of old age!
Report to administrator
+1 #4 Akot 2023-03-16 19:01
Quoting PaulM:


we all know it is a scam like the others before it. Poverty is here to stay so long as Mu7 is in power.


Thanks.

Tribally powerless divided ruled Ugandans are slaves of migrant Museveni & family for good!

There is no way poverty will get better, except for tribal leaders, mps, ministers, those in posts ensuring Museveni's evil rule!

Change is brought by people who want it; the poor, young, mothers, old who want a different life for the next generation!

UNITY is all Ugandans need, if they want to end Museveni's evil rule, ownership of their land, tax money, control of every institution!
Report to administrator
0 #5 Lakwena 2023-03-17 10:00
Thanks Mr. Lee Oguzu. For 38 years and counting, who in his/her right state of mind can still deny that: Ugandans are stuck with a heartless regime of con-men/women (bafele), by con-men/women and for con-men/women only.

As if bewitched, because of their apparent ignorance and desperate situation; Gen Tibuhaburwa a mufele by birth, keeps telling Ugandans what they desperately want to hear (too good to be true) and man keeps getting away with plunder and murder.

Otherwise, how e.g., do iron sh*ts meant for the people Karamoja find themselves in the Minister of Finance and Speaker of Parliaments compounds; and Gen Tibuhaburwa did not say a word about it, when he addressed parliament on 16th March 2023?

In other words, the whole saga/scandal is Gen Tibuhaburwa Cartel Syndicated and Legacy.
Report to administrator
-2 #6 Kyokufente 2023-03-20 15:45
Quoting Lysol:
Young man, it seems you are clueless and too rudimentary about the article you have posted. While at it take a better selfie of yourself.


Lysol, it helps to point out the "cluelessness and the too rudimentary" aspects of the article with alternative explanations or clarifications thereof.

That is what enlightened people do other than the deafening sound of your comment.
Report to administrator
+1 #7 Lysol 2023-03-20 18:38
Quoting Kyokufente:
Quoting Lysol:
Young man, it seems you are clueless and too rudimentary about the article you have posted. While at it take a better selfie of yourself.


Lysol, it helps to point out the "cluelessness and the too rudimentary" aspects of the article with alternative explanations or clarifications thereof.

That is what enlightened people do other than the deafening sound of your comment.


I can't help you on that one. Why don't you point out what you really understand about the article to us? Unless, of course, you are a clueless and gullible simpleton.
Report to administrator
0 #8 Kyokufente 2023-03-21 17:36
Quoting Lysol:
Quoting Kyokufente:
Quoting Lysol:
Young man, it seems you are clueless and too rudimentary about the article you have posted. While at it take a better selfie of yourself.


Lysol, it helps to point out the "cluelessness and the too rudimentary" aspects of the article with alternative explanations or clarifications thereof.

That is what enlightened people do other than the deafening sound of your comment.


I can't help you on that one. Why don't you point out what you really understand about the article to us? Unless, of course, you are a clueless and gullible simpleton.


I see, that is a really smart way of defending your assertions. Stop embarrassing your self like this.

Again, a sense of embarrassment left some seemingly learned individuals.
Report to administrator

Comments are now closed for this entry