Log in

Buganda princess drags Kabaka to court over land

Kabaka Ronald Muwenda Mutebi

Kabaka Ronald Muwenda Mutebi

The daughter of prince George William Chwa has dragged the Kabaka of Buganda kingdom, Ronald Muwenda Mutebi II and six others to court for alleged trespass on their family land found in Munyonyo suburbs in Wakiso district.

The other respondents to the suit are Kampala Capital City Authority (KCCA), the commissioner Land Registration Joseph Sempebwa, prince Kassim Kakungulu Nakibinge, Ferikitansi Keziya Nabisenke and princess Namukabya Nfamba in the Land Division of High court.  

Through her lawyers of Guma and Company Advocates, Edith Mpologoma contends that she is a direct beneficiary of the estate of prince Chwa the son and heir of the late Buganda king Sir Daudi Chwa who died in 1939.   

According to Mpologoma, Chwa owned the land measuring 18 square miles and obtained certificate number 18292 from the colonial administration. She explains that part of the land measuring 5.8 acres was given to the customary heir of Chwa comprising plots number 45 and 46 at Salaama Munyonyo. 

Although Chwa had reportedly issued provisional certificates to some beneficiaries, Mpologoma says many didn’t take further steps to get land titles for the land. She contends that the said land was leased by the Lands Registry and a title issued to Kabaka Mutebi but has since expired. However, plot 46 is still in the names of prince George William Chwa.

She faults the Land Registry of returning the contentious land to the Kabaka Mutebi in 2013 as part of the kingdom’s “official mailo land” yet the property was part of the private estate of prince George William Chwa.  

Mpologoma contends that there is a big difference between the land that belonged to the kingdom, which Buganda Land Board can manage as the controlling authority of Kabaka’s institutional land, and the land meant for princes and princesses, which is owned privately.

She faults the Kabaka’s agents for misleading government and the commissioner Land Registration to return the contentious property to the kingdom without conducting research to establish ownership.  

Mpologoma says the Lands Registry came up with defective land titles purportedly signed by the commissioner/registrar in 1923 and 2013 with no explicit deed print of plot 45, but a combination of several plots of land whose leases have since expired.      

She says that unless the Kabaka’s title is declared defective and cancelled, government and the public stand to lose immensely as government through KCCA is about to commit substantial resources towards construction of a sewerage lagoon on land whose ownership is heavily contested.

The applicant estimates the subject matter of her suit to be Shs 5 billion. The matter is yet to be fixed for hearing.  


0 #11 Akot 2019-09-14 14:15
WADADA roger, thanks.

This is why only UNITY will give final answers by showing Museveni way out, then Ugandans will go for the kind of governance they want!

Is there any reason Ugandans keep migrant Museveni who owns every land riches, when their UNITY can set them FREE to govern their land/lands as they want?

Why is Museveni still in State House?
Report to administrator
0 #12 Akot 2019-09-14 14:23
Quoting kabayekka:
..the owners of these African Ancient lands will have to take the traditional land laws in their own hands and get back their ancestry lands, before they are made homeless in their own country!

Rightly put!

Either you own your land & govern & live FREELY, or you are slaves!

Why is it migrant Museveni who restored tribal leaders' posts & they go along as if it's them the migrants at the mercy of Museveni without whom they are NOTHING?

Why is Museveni allowed to make Ugandans landless migrants at his mercy, when Ugandans can Reform the Republic or go for Independent Triabl States/Lands?
Report to administrator
0 #13 Akot 2019-09-14 14:26
Charles Dicken Oruk, understood.

What will Ugandans do if Museveni dissolves posts of tribal leadeers & reforms Uganda as he likes?

And what will be the situation after Museveni?
Report to administrator
0 #14 Akot 2019-09-14 14:36
Lysol, thanks.

Sir E. Mutesa ll opted for the 'Republic of Uganda' because he believed it was the best choice for him & Bagandans! Even when Dr Obote became power hungry & abrogated the constitution & declared himself president, Sur Mutesa went in exile & never caused trouble for Buganda/Uganda!

With Museveni who wants to own Uganda & make us migrants/refugees/slaves, there is no way any tribe will be at home, unless the demon is thrown out FIRST IN UNITY, then we'll go for what we want!

The beginning of peace will begin when Museveni is out of the zone he has no tribal land in, yet is going to own it finally, under our noses!
Report to administrator
0 #15 Akot 2019-09-14 14:51
Quoting karemire:

Blind faith in traditional leadership can be costly,


This blind faith of Ugandans in traditional leadership has made Museveni god in the zone & will hand over the entire zone to Museveni: the bills/papers they still believe protect them, will be of no use then!

But of course leader are the last to see what Museveni has in store!
Report to administrator

Comments are now closed for this entry