Log in
Free: The Observer Mobile App - Exclusive Content and Services

Robert Mugabe: from Zimbabwe liberator to oppressor

RIP: Robert Mugabe

RIP: Robert Mugabe

Zimbabwe’s Robert Mugabe was feted as an African liberation hero and champion of racial reconciliation when he first came to power in a nation divided by nearly a century of white colonial rule.

Nearly four decades later, many at home and abroad denounced him as a power-obsessed autocrat willing to unleash death squads, rig elections and trash the economy in the relentless pursuit of control.

Mugabe, was ultimately ousted by his own armed forces in November 2017. He demonstrated his tenacity — some might say stubbornness — to the last, refusing to accept his expulsion from his own ZANU-PF party and clinging on for a week until parliament started to impeach him after the de facto coup.

His resignation triggered wild celebrations across the country of 13 million. For Mugabe, it was an “unconstitutional and humiliating” act of betrayal by his party and people, and left him a broken man.

Confined for the remaining years of his life between Singapore where he was receiving medical treatment and his sprawling “Blue Roof” mansion in Harare, an ailing Mugabe could only observe from afar the political stage where he once strode tall. He was bitter to the end over the manner of his exit.

On the eve of the July 2018 election, the first without him, he told reporters he would vote for the opposition, something unthinkable only a few months before.

Took power in 1980

Educated and urbane, Mugabe took power in 1980 after seven years of a liberation bush war and — until the army’s takeover — was the only leader Zimbabwe, formerly Rhodesia, knew since independence from Britain.

But as the economy imploded starting from 2000 and his mental and physical health waned, Mugabe found fewer people to trust as he seemingly smoothed a path to succession for his wife, Grace, four decades his junior and known to her critics as “Gucci Grace” for her reputed fondness for luxury shopping.

“It’s the end of a very painful and sad chapter in the history of a young nation, in which a dictator, as he became old, surrendered his court to a gang of thieves around his wife,” Chris Mutsvangwa, leader of Zimbabwe’s influential liberation war veterans, told Reuters after Mugabe’s removal.

‘A jewel’

Born on Feb. 21, 1924, on a Roman Catholic mission near Harare, Mugabe was educated by Jesuit priests and worked as a primary school teacher before going to South Africa’s University of Fort Hare, then a breeding ground for African nationalism.

Returning to then-Rhodesia in 1960, he entered politics but was jailed for a decade four years later for opposing white rule.

When his infant son died of malaria in Ghana in 1966, Mugabe was denied parole to attend the funeral, a decision by the government of white-minority leader Ian Smith that historians say played a part in explaining Mugabe’s subsequent bitterness.

After his release, he rose to the top of the powerful Zimbabwe African National Liberation Army, known as the “thinking man’s guerrilla” on account of his seven degrees, three of them earned behind bars.

Later, as he crushed his political enemies, he boasted of another qualification: “a degree in violence.”

After the war ended in 1980, Mugabe was elected the nation’s first black prime minister.

“You have inherited a jewel in Africa. Don’t tarnish it,” Tanzanian President Julius Nyerere told him during the independence celebrations in Harare.

At first, reconciliation

Initially, Mugabe offered forgiveness and reconciliation to old foreign and domestic adversaries, including Smith, who remained on his farm and continued to receive a government pension.

In his early years, he presided over a booming economy, spending money on roads and dams and expanding schooling for black Zimbabweans as part of a wholesale dismantling of the racial discrimination of colonial days.

With black and white tension easing, by the mid-1980s many whites who had fled to Britain or South Africa, then still under the yoke of apartheid, were trying to come home.

No challengers

But it was not long before Mugabe began to suppress challengers, including liberation war rival Joshua Nkomo.

Faced with a revolt in the mid-1980s in the western province of Matabeleland that he blamed on Nkomo, Mugabe sent in North Korean-trained army units, provoking an international outcry over alleged atrocities against civilians.

Human rights groups say 20,000 people died, most of them from the minority Ndebele tribe from which Nkomo’s partisans were largely drawn. The discovery of mass graves prompted accusations of genocide.

After two terms as prime minister, Mugabe tightened his grip on power by changing the constitution, and he became president in 1987. His first wife, Sally, who had been seen by many as the only person capable of restraining him, died in 1992.

Grace Marufu, bride of Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe waves at guests, Aug. 17, 1996, after their wedding ceremony at the Kutama Catholic mission

A turning point came at the end of the decade when Mugabe, by now a leader unaccustomed to accommodating the will of the people, suffered his first major defeat at the hands of voters, in a referendum on another constitution. He blamed his loss on the white minority, chastising them as “enemies of Zimbabwe.”

Days later, a groundswell of black anger at the slow pace of land reform started boiling over and gangs of black Zimbabweans calling themselves war veterans started to overrun white-owned farms.

Mugabe’s response was uncompromising, labeling the invasions a correction of colonial injustices.

“Perhaps we made a mistake by not finishing the war in the trenches,” he said in 2000. “If the settlers had been defeated through the barrel of a gun, perhaps we would not be having the same problems.” 

The farm seizures helped ruin one of Africa’s most dynamic economies, with a collapse in agricultural foreign exchange earnings unleashing hyperinflation.

The economy shrank by more than a third from 2000 to 2008, sending unemployment above 80%. Several million Zimbabweans fled, mostly to South Africa.

Brushing aside criticism, Mugabe portrayed himself as a radical African nationalist competing against racist and imperialist forces in Washington and London.

Rock bottom

The country hit rock bottom in 2008, when 500 billion percent inflation drove people to support the challenge of Western-backed former union leader Morgan Tsvangirai.

Facing defeat in a presidential run-off, Mugabe resorted to violence, forcing Tsvangirai to withdraw after scores of his supporters were killed by ZANU-PF thugs.

South Africa, Zimbabwe’s neighbor to the south, squeezed the pair into a fractious unity coalition but the compromise belied Mugabe’s grip on power through his continued control of the army, police and secret service.

As old age crept in and rumors of cancer intensified, his animosity towards Tsvangirai eased and the two men enjoyed weekly meetings over tea and scones, in a nod to Mugabe’s affection for British traditions.

On the eve of the 2013 election, Mugabe dismissed cries of autocracy and likened dealing with Tsvangirai to sparring in the ring.

“Although we boxed each other, it’s not as hostile as before,” he told reporters.

Even as he spoke, Mugabe’s agents were busy finalizing plans to engineer an election victory through manipulation of the voters’ roll, according to the Tsvangirai camp.

It was typical of Mugabe’s ability to outthink — and if necessary outfight — his opponents, a trait that drew grudging respect from even his sternest critics.

Writing in a 2007 cable released by WikiLeaks, then-U.S. ambassador to Harare Christopher Dell reflected the views of many: “To give the devil his due, he is a brilliant tactician.”

Comments

0 #1 Akot 2019-09-06 13:03
The timing for this article is bad, please, let's just look back & wake up to realise that no matter what we believe we are & what we do to one another, only God has the final solution!

For now, let's give Mugabe's children, family, his supporters the space needed to say good bye to him!

Yet, it's a very good opportunity to ask Ugandans to WAKE UP, bring down the tribalistic system & UNITE & not leave Museveni die in office, dictating peacefully for another +3 decades!
Report to administrator
+3 #2 Wooden K. 2019-09-06 18:33
Oh well well well !
There comes a time when you run out of options.

No tears here .
Report to administrator
0 #3 Akot 2019-09-06 22:58
Wooden K., agreed.

Life doesn't even belong nor is controlled by those who believe they are the only rulers that can be replaced by others!

This is why Ugandans MUST give themselves bringing down the tribalistic system & their UNITY will give chance to throw Museveni out, then they will be able to form the kind of governance they want &s this MUST be befored Museveni drops dead & leaves them in the tribalistic system without common National Leader accepted by ALL, to lead them to the next step!

Even Independent Tribal States/Lands will save Ugandans from confusion, going back to past mistakes, getting at those who teargased, harrass, arrested/imprisoned them to keep Museveni in power without defiance!

Unless Ugandans want Museveni's military son to continue the family business after the dad's death!...
Report to administrator
+1 #4 Akot 2019-09-06 23:04
...Ugandans are in a road leading to no where, but to maintaining Museveni & his family businees, Uganda!

See how UK is in pieces, the people so confused, lost because the very people who should UNITE around B. Johnson to make stand as a real nation with Brussels, are the ones blocking him, thus blocking the entire UK, making it NOTHING!

How on earth can B. Johnson go to Brussels to represent British as their PM, speak for them, defend their nation, when he is alone?

Even British who went for & got Brexit are so quiet & don't exist any more while UK is now a tribally divided zone, like Uganda - the British/Ugandans are at war with themselves while Museveni/Brussels enjoy their MASTERS positions!

How can British/Ugandans go for more election , when they are enemies of themselves & cannot be lead/represented by any of them, especially not face to Museveni/Brussels?
Report to administrator
+1 #5 Akot 2019-09-06 23:19
Zimbabweans are lucky, they got rid of Mugabe before he droped dead of old age & left the seat empty!

Zimbabweans who want to have a future in a better country MUST elelct a white Zimbabwean at next election or they will continue to starve in that rich country!

Africa is so rich yet it's Americans/Europeans who enjoy land riches! Our leaders are so uneducated, lack know-how, power hungry, are theives who only work for themselves/families, are bent on selling off our land riches while our population go poor, migrate to USA/Europe!

Ah! African rulers are not even aware USA/Europe get the money they use to develop/serve their people, from mainly badly governed Africa!

Where does Museveni get tax money he own, from & is he not impatient oil gets out?
Report to administrator
+3 #6 Lysol 2019-09-07 20:03
"Another one gone and bites the dust". Well Mugabe started well for 20 years and became greedy and paranoia and fearful like most tyrants do. As someone who went to college with some his former guerrilla soldiers, I can relate.

The problem with many Africans so-called liberators, they don't emulate Mandela who handed over power just after 5 years; even though he fought for it for 27 years in jail/behind bars. He will always be the real and only hero of Africa for many years to come.

Unlike the stubborn ones who will die(or killed) lonely; sometimes in foreign countries.

Mugabe was lucky that his generals where patient with him and let him live for another day. Never let your enemies dance on your grave.
Report to administrator
+1 #7 sula 2019-09-08 11:11
1- As always no matter how many you kill, how long you stay in power, how rich you are ;the destination is the same - you will die !

2- It is unfortunate that he was allowed to kill the country before he died. This is the reason why countries like Uganda should pray for the quick death of the people who are involved in killing the country !
Report to administrator
0 #8 Lakwena 2019-09-10 12:59
Quoting sula:
1- As always no matter how many you kill, how long you stay in power, how rich you are ;the destination is the same - you will die !

2- It is unfortunate that he was allowed to kill the country before he died. This is the reason why countries like Uganda should pray for the quick death of the people who are involved in killing the country !


In other words Sula, the saddest part of the death of an African dictator in a Singaporean hospital is the scene; where the medical staff hold their noses at the dictator, but take the money (our money) anyway as they wheel away his wreckage of falling apart in office
Report to administrator

Comments are now closed for this entry

betPawa