Log in

Museveni's mobile money tax 'revision' null & void - MPs

Despite President Yoweri Museveni's 'revision' of the mobile money tax from one per cent to 0.5 per cent, parliament says any changes in the tax regime can only come into effect after the amendment of Excise Duty Amendment Act 2018 passed by the House earlier in May. 

The new taxes came into effect on July 1 when telecoms started a one per cent tax levy on each mobile money transaction including on every deposit, every amount sent, received or paid. 
  
The multiple deductions drew outrage from mobile money users who accused government of double taxation drawing the attention of the president. In his communication, Museveni explained that there was a miscommunication, saying the mobile money tax should be 0.5 per cent and not one per cent. 

He also explained that the tax is only applicable on those sending and receiving money through mobile money and not those depositing money on their mobile money account. However, the president's directive can only come into effect following the due process of parliament, MPs have said. It is not clear how the president assented to the law, which according to him had a miscommunication. 

 
Mobile money users are charged 1% tax levy for every transaction
Parliament derives its authority from Article 79 of the 1995 Constitution. It provides that "Subject to the provisions of this Constitution, parliament shall have power to make laws on any matter for peace, order, development and good governance of Uganda." 
 
It further notes that "No person or body other than parliament shall have power to make provisions having the force of law in Uganda except under authority conferred by an Act of parliament."

Parliament's Finance Committee chairperson Henry Musasizi says since the proposal to revise the mobile money tax was made by the president, government ought to table an amendment bill before the House for consideration. He explains that in this case, it is the ministry of Finance which ought to draft the bill and send it to cabinet for endorsement.

Once approved, cabinet forwards the bill to the first Parliamentary Council, which is mandated with the responsibility of drafting it. After this process, the bill is returned to cabinet for perusal and dispatched for printing and publication in the Gazette for the public to read. 

The mover of the bill then tables it in parliament for the first reading, before it's committed to the Finance Committee for scrutiny. The Committee scrutinises the bill and returns it to parliament for the second reading within 45 days. The bill is then read for the second time and debated by members in parliament, where government is expected to justify it.
 
This is then followed by the third reading. Parliament can make changes to particulars of the bill before approving it. Musasizi says the president's proposal can only come into effect after August.  

"Then [the amendment] you give it 45 days, it says within 45 days. The Committee can consider the bill and report back to the House, so you’re looking at a period to be very sure you’re looking at a period between August and September for the president’s proposal to pass through parliament." said Musasizi.

 
Musasizi says currently, Ugandans have no option but to continue paying the tax until the due process is followed.
 
"That is the existing law, that law can only be amended through parliament. It goes through the normal because this was not just an instrument, it was a decision of parliament through an Act of parliament. So to amend an Act, you bring an amendment bill to that Act, the president cannot just say I have removed this tax," added Musasizi.

Musasizi also says that although the focus is on the one per cent mobile money levy, the initial charges by telecom companies are also very high and should be debated. Ministry of Finance spokesperson Jim Mugunga says they are working with the institutions involved to effect the president's proposal.

 
"When the president made a pronouncement, what happens now is that the relevant institutions will now implement it. It could be aspects that are implemented by URA [Uganda Revenue Authority], by UCC [Uganda Communications Commission], by the telecom companies," said Mugunga.

Hamson Denis Obua, the Ajuri County MP, says when the amendment comes back to parliament, it should be made to meet the public expectation. He says it is very clearly that the first proposal can't work. Telecoms are still enforcing the 1 per cent mobile money levy despite the fact that some mobile money users think it has been revised to 0.5 per cent.

 
Finance minister Matia Kasaija also disowned the 1 per cent mobile money tax levy, saying it was passed by parliament while he was out of the country. He said cabinet had approved the 0.5 per cent levy and not 1%. However, days later, he read the 2018/19 financial year budget that included the 1 per cent levy. 
 
Several MPs interviewed by local media have said they did not fully understand the law they passed. Only about 38 MPs debated on the taxation regime, with 28 opposed to it.
 
However, when voice voting came, the 'ayes' had it. Kyadondo East MP Robert Kyagulanyi who was in the House during the debate, said many of his colleagues especially the NRM MPs were not in the plenary but only came in as 'voting machines' and that is how the bill was passed into the now unpopular law. 

Janet Hamala, a mobile money vendor in Kampala, says the one per cent tax levy has made mobile money costly to their customers.
 
"If you are sending Shs 100,000 for instance, apart from the initial Shs 1,600 mobile money charge the customer pays an additional Shs 1,000 and for that person to withdraw the money is charged Shs 1000" she said.
 
Another vendor at Nakasero market said that the mobile money tax has pushed away many of their clients away. 

Comments

0 #11 Akot 2018-07-10 18:40
gwok, agreed, yet,

Idi Amin was a real man, a real dictator who did not rule through a tribalistic system with tribal leaders shouldering/joining him to abuse Ugandans!

Amid did not have mps & parliament was used for military gatherings & feasting!

Ugandans don't want to UNITE, tribal leaders are not standing down to shatter the disgusting inhuman tribalistic system, there is no common opposition leader, so there is no need for Ugandans to go for next presidential election!

Neither should Ugandans elect mps again knowing they work for Museveni & not electorate!
Report to administrator
0 #12 Akot 2018-07-10 18:49
Quoting WADADA rogers:
Syndicate as usual, you elect people to Government only to play hide and seek with the population


Agreed!

No more electionof either Museveni or mps, as it will only make the outside world continue laughing at Ugandans!

MPs are elected to ensure tax money is used wisely for development: education, subsidise/promote/modernize agriculture, health, roads, social housing...!

Uganda tax money is owned by Museveni who uses it as he wishes & corruption is the order of the day with no institutions spared & mps only come in to get their share too!

There are no plans to include Ugandans in Museveni world! By end of this term 35 years will be more than enough - no normal people can go for yet another election under the same demon who controls everything & allows no opposition!
Report to administrator
0 #13 Akot 2018-07-10 18:57
Odongkara,

Amin did not love Uganda & he wanted a Uganda without Acholi & Lango!

After 5 years in power, Amin turned on Buganda & many educated Bagandans in posts had to flee the country!

Amin flooded Uganda with Sudanese in just 1 week after he took power: all posts, businesses, government houses were taken over by them!

Museveni is trying his best to own Uganda constitutionally first before Rwandese take over government posts/houses...!
Report to administrator
0 #14 Akot 2018-07-10 19:03
Quoting Zzungulu zungulu:
Ugandans surely don't need MPs, if they can be shameless and refuse to pay tax as they earn!


Thanks!

How can Ugandans still go to bring in mps after all this masquarade?

Ugandans still have brains; yes or no?

At least tribal leaders are not elected but payed by their chief for doing NOTHING!
Report to administrator
0 #15 Akot 2018-07-10 19:16
Quoting Kabayekka:
So now how much does it cost the tax payer to take these VIP of The NRM Parliament for a course in parliament affairs?


Good question!

I believe it' s not cost, but need of presence of parliament to gives letigimacy to Museveni's governance to the outside world: as long as Ugandans elect president/mps, the country is democratic, especially when it's peaceful & Ugandans just go along!

Ugandans chose Museveni in peace & no outsider can put this in question & bring trouble to them!

How Museveni spends tax money, how he serves Ugandans does not trouble them to a point to make them UNITE & rise up against him!

The next 30 years will be even more easier for Museveni!
Report to administrator

Comments are now closed for this entry

betPawa