Log in
Updated few hours ago
Free: The Observer Mobile App - Exclusive Content and Services

Here are key lessons from Kabaka’s cabinet reshuffle

Kabaka Ronald Muwenda Mutebi

Kabaka Ronald Muwenda Mutebi

Kabaka Ronald Mutebi reshuffled his government last week. Like most of his changes, the announcement came over the weekend. Besides the style of how he makes his changes, his new cabinet is very lean.

Without advisors and some staff, cabinet is just 12 people even though the list included the Lukiiko (parliament) speaker and his deputy. There was a time Mengo had probably 50 ministers and I always wondered what they were doing apart from getting seats on the high table at events. Of course the title of Oweekitibwa (honourable) is endearing and opens a few doors, in real substance, the more people they are, the less work gets done.

So, in trimming his government significantly, Mutebi was sending a message to his katikkiro and everyone else that business is no longer as usual. It is time for work. It is said that the minister just like the katikkiro are expected to work fulltime.

One of the problems Mengo has always had was relying on volunteers. Volunteers are very good people and they enabled the kingdom register significant success in the past. But at the leadership level in Uganda of today, there are many limitations to voluntarism.

You hardly put volunteers to account. They come to office as they wish and you cannot demand a lot from their time as they have to go and find resources that will enable them live decent lives. So, ministers in Mengo like most of them in voluntary organisations, were many and worked very hard but it was not always effective.

For example, it is demoralizing if you called a meeting of 40 people and only 25 turned up. When you have 12 ministers, if you have eight to 10 available (and the others you know where they are) for a meeting, things work.

And also if they are working fulltime, you give them specific terms of reference and if they don’t work, you can easily fire them. Through regular performance reviews, ministers would know that they are to be fired if they don’t deliver. So, they will put in much more effort than they have been doing previously.

When the Kabaka released his new list of ministers, I checked the USA’s cabinet. It is the world’s biggest economy and its list is just 21 members. This list includes the president, vice president, ministers (secretaries), White House chief of staff, attorney general and directors of national intelligence, Central Intelligence Agency, and management and budget. That may explain why the USA is the biggest economy in the world—the cabinet is lean, which makes it efficient.

Big cabinets create intrigue and jostling for attention from the appointing authority and the public. Everyone wants to be seen even if it means stepping on each other’s toes. It is easy for people to forget the big picture as they pursue personal glory.

Also resources that would be used to deliver services end up paying for cabinet members. The 4X4s our ministers drive cost as much as $180,000 each. So, if you have 70 ministers, that is $12.6m on vehicles every few years. With only 20 ministers, you would save $9m every five years, which can be used to deliver services. In fact the $9m is conservative because it doesn’t include fuel, drivers, guards, secretaries, office space and such other expenses.

But the lessons from Kabaka’s reshuffle are not only for governments. Businesses can learn a thing or two, looking at small numbers to create efficiency.

Of course some people will argue that smaller governments and businesses lead to unemployment, which is not true. As long as people are innovative, the economy works for everyone, there will be jobs.

djjuuko@gmail.com

The writer is a communication and visibility consultant.

Comments

-2 #1 kabayekka 2019-03-05 15:38
Did we not tell this point to the government of Mengo a long time ago?

Of course in modern governments these are viable lessons to work with other than to listen to and to talk well about them.

Buganda is a country state with its constitution and the Lukiiko which the previous Presidents of Uganda insisted on removing by the force of arms.

The present African government of Uganda only recognizes its own elected members of Parliament and recommends the Kabaka of Buganda and his government as an African Cultural Charade of the Ganda tribesmen and tribeswomen who must stay put below the Political Central Government misrule.
Report to administrator
0 #2 Juwait kali 2019-03-05 21:42
You gonna end up with crocodiles just like nrm. Volunteers do a good honest job.

It works for them because they prefer it that way to make it look like its not a one man's show. I agree with the path you're going to try of paying them. You need however to ensure volunteers input is facilitated.

The real problem however is what is Mengos objective? To exist just in name? A lot of baganda people died in Luwero so that ebyaffe along side the kingdom are returned. 33 years later?

Our security depends on federal what is happening there? Clearly Mayiga has decided that he would go for personal grory rather than saving the Kingdom what is he doing there still? I have started organising normal people soon we are gonna match to Bulange and start demanding federal. Awangaale.
Report to administrator
-2 #3 kabayekka 2019-03-05 22:07
Observer you have got to write out our comments.

If it is to direct those complaining about our comments you have got our e-mail. FDC has nothing to do with the Kingdom of Buganda my friend, Editor.
Report to administrator

Comments are now closed for this entry