Log in

Age limit: Legal committee set to endorse bill

Opposition working on minority report

A critical assessment of witnesses who appeared before the Legal and Parliamentary Affairs committee to give views on the age limit bill shows a slight majority want the 75-year cap removed.

Igara West MP Raphael Magyezi drafted the bill seeking to scrap presidential age limits from the Constitution. On Tuesday, the committee finalized hearings in which 34 individuals and groups participated. At least 18 supported the removal of the age limits while those against the removal were 12.

The committee had initially invited more than 60 stakeholders, including political, religious and civil society organisations as well as opposition legislators but many declined the offer. Makerere University law dons described the process an illegality while some said it was ‘already a done deal.’

Others who declined to appear include Uganda Law Society (ULS), Dr Kizza Besigye; Inter Religious Council of Uganda (IRCU); former premier Prof Apolo Nsibambi and political parties FDC, UPC and People’s Progressive Party (PPP).

Chairman Jacob Oboth-Oboth presiding over the committee

Meanwhile, the Electoral Commission, Uganda Law Reform Commission and Equal Opportunities Commission had no clear position on the amendments and remained neutral.

REMOVE AGE LIMITS

Among those who supported the amendments were Magyezi, Prime Minister Dr Ruhakana Rugunda, Justice and Constitutional Affairs minister Kahinda Otafiire, NRM Deputy Secretary General Richard Todwong, youth pressure group Kick All Age Limits Out of the Constitution (KALOC), Rtd Maj Gen Jim Muhwezi (NRM Veterans) and Prof Tarsis Kabwegyere.

In their presentations, these groups opined that the current provisions in Article 102 (b) limit participation in electoral politics and are discriminatory in nature.

Todwong, for instance caused uproar when he insinuated that the clause on presidential age limit was smuggled into the Constitution.

However, his assertion was discredited by Dr Rugunda, who told the committee that all the provisions in the Constitution were debated and agreed upon by Constituent Assembly delegates, including himself as a representative of Kabale municipality.

NO AMENDMENT

The 12 witnesses who opposed age limit removal include Amanya Mushega, Prof Fredrick Ssempebwa, Peter Mulira, Prof Venansius Baryamureeba, Prof George Kanyeihamba, Leader of Opposition Winnie Kiiza and DP leader Norbert Mao, among others.

In their opinion, the amendments provide an avenue for President Museveni to easily breeze through the 2021 presidential election without legal inhibition.

Norbert Mao with Ken Lukyamuzi before the committee

Wilfred Niwagaba, the Shadow Attorney General, told The Observer that the absence of key stakeholders in the consultations raises doubts about the credibility of the whole process.

“Many of those invited to the committee were simply ‘parroting’ the same message as the NRM party and the process of smuggling the bill would not have been endorsed by right thinking members of society,” he said.

“The bill was not brought in good faith but to favour specific individuals. We respect the fact that they declined to be part of this process, marred with illegality. We plan to capture this in our minority report,” he added.

REGIONAL CONSULTATIONS

By press time yesterday, some committee members were holed up in a meeting with the Speaker Rebecca Kadaga to endorse their five-region consultative meetings on the bill, budgeted at Shs 700 million.

“As a committee, we agreed to go and meet the people upcountry but since we do not have the funds, we need the speaker’s counsel on the way forward,” one of the MPs said.

eyotaru@gmail.com

Comments   

+4 #1 edward mukyanda 2017-11-24 09:15
Well, time will prove you right or wrong. And the curse from the population will extend to your children and Grand Children.

You will regret like many who participated in removing term limits, but never will you be able to reverse your thoughtless actions, succumbing to the wishes of one person.

Not forgetting that power belongs to you, and that bone is as powerful as those he leads allow him to, if we all say NO, like Mugabe has been showed recently, no doubt victory can be for the voices of reason,
Quote | Report to administrator
+5 #2 Tenga 2017-11-24 11:11
Why waste UGX. 700,000,000/- more on makeups to an ugly foregone, deceitful foolery!

This is a poisoned challis cup that many will try to contest on other arena.
Quote | Report to administrator
+1 #3 kirya 2017-11-25 01:00
These are the best fools alive!! They are scared of an old washed up man running the country to a toilet waste.

Doctors are on strike, lecturers are soon joining the line, teachers are under paid the roads are in a sorry state and the list goes on. Uganda is a country of idiots.
Quote | Report to administrator
0 #4 dembula 2017-11-25 15:14
Am not sure what the author of this article was trying to say.

Is he saying that because there were more pro people before the committee it will be passed to the house?

If this is the case then M7 will have achieve the ultimate. Using numbers and not intellect to maintain his grip on power.

Maybe I am old school but if this committee has not listened to and evaluated the intellectual arguments for and against, they might as well be robots.

If at the end of the day the only input needed for them to support the bill is money, what is the difference with feeding data into a computer with a pre-arranged logarithm?

Oh, I'd forgotten computers are much cheaper!!
Quote | Report to administrator
0 #5 kabayekka 2017-11-25 16:16
Indeed let this legal committee get on with meeting the people of Uganda as they keep showing off their expensive work at 700 million shillings of tax payers money.

They must not allow the police to surround them, and must record this public uproar as those against the bill demostrate outside their up country offices.
Quote | Report to administrator
+1 #6 rubangakene 2017-11-25 20:05
KAZI BURE TUU! Committee or no committee, this is a vain business that will end up futile, mark my word.

History is on the side of the masses. Even God sent Moses to deliver his people from such endeavour!
Quote | Report to administrator
0 #7 Robert Atuhairwe 2017-11-26 20:15
I missed a chance to appear and submit. Those who didn't turn up are......let me stop there
Quote | Report to administrator